IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2021 · 50 citations · 39 references
Recently, there has been a wealth of development in motion planning for robotic manipulation—new motion planners are continuously proposed, each with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. However, evaluating new planners is challenging and researchers often create their own ad-hoc problems for benchmarking, which is time-consuming, prone to bias, and does not directly compare against other state-of-the-art planners. We present <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MotionBenchMaker</small> , an open-source tool to generate benchmarking datasets for realistic robot manipulation problems. <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MotionBenchMaker</small> is designed to be an extensible, easy-to-use tool that allows users to both generate datasets and benchmark them by comparing motion planning algorithms. Empirically, we show the benefit of using <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MotionBenchMaker</small> as a tool to procedurally generate datasets which helps in the fair evaluation of planners. We also present a suite of 40 prefabricated datasets, with 5 different commonly used robots in 8 environments, to serve as a common ground to accelerate motion planning research.
39
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher et al. · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2009 · 60.2K citations
OctoMap: an efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees
Armin Hornung, Kai M. Wurm, Maren Bennewitz et al. · Autonomous Robots · 2013 · 2.8K citations
The Open Motion Planning Library
Ioan A. Şucan, Mark Moll, Lydia E. Kavraki · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · 2012 · 1.6K citations