The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation

Michael D. Hartline, O. C. Ferrell

Journal of Marketing · 1996 · 695 citations · 53 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study develops and tests a model of service employee management that simultaneously examines manager‑employee, employee‑role, and employee‑customer interfaces. The authors investigate how customer‑contact employees’ attitudes and behaviors affect service quality perceptions, and how empowerment, behavior‑based evaluation, and management commitment serve as formal control mechanisms. Results show that managers committed to service quality tend to empower employees and use behavior‑based evaluation, with empowerment having both positive and negative effects that are mitigated by evaluation; enhancing employee self‑efficacy, job satisfaction, and reducing role conflict and ambiguity improves customers’ service quality perceptions.

Abstract

The authors develop and test a model of service employee management that examines constructs simultaneously across three interfaces of the service delivery process: manager-employee, employee-role, and employee-customer. The authors examine the attitudinal and behavioral responses of customer-contact employees that can influence customers’ perceptions of service quality, the relationships among these responses, and three formal managerial control mechanisms (empowerment, behavior-based employee evaluation, and management commitment to service quality). The findings indicate that managers who are committed to service quality are more likely to empower their employees and use behavior-based evaluation. However, the use of empowerment has both positive and negative consequences in the management of contact employees. Some of the negative consequences are mitigated by the positive effects of behavior-based employee evaluation. To increase customers’ perceptions of service quality, managers must increase employees’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction, and reduce employees’ role conflict and ambiguity. Implications for the management of customer-contact service employees and directions for further research are discussed.

References

53