Benefits of Systematic Phonics Instruction

Saskia de Graaff, A.M.T. Bosman, Fred Hasselman, Ludo Verhoeven

Scientific Studies of Reading · 2009 · 92 citations · 18 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Systematic phonics instruction is more effective than nonsystematic phonics for teaching reading. Both systematic and nonsystematic phonics were delivered through computer programs teaching Dutch grapheme‑phoneme correspondences, and both phonics groups showed similar gains in letter‑sound knowledge relative to a control group. The systematic phonics group made greater gains in phonemic awareness, spelling, and reading than the nonsystematic phonics group and the control group.

Abstract

Systematic-phonics instruction appears to be more effective than nonsystematic phonics instruction for teaching reading (Ehri, Nunes, Stahl, & Willows, 2001 Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A. and Willows, D. M. 2001. Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panels meta-analysis.. Review of Educational Research, 71: 393–447. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In the present study, a systematic phonics approach was directly compared with a nonsystematic phonics approach for kindergarten children. Both approaches were delivered using computer programs teaching the same Dutch grapheme–phoneme correspondences. Both phonics-trained groups progressed to the same extent on productive letter-sound knowledge compared to the control group. However, on measures of phonemic awareness, spelling, and reading, the systematic phonics group made more progress than the nonsystematic phonics group and the control group.

References

18