Complementarity in Phenolic Compounds and the Antioxidant Activities of Phaseolus coccineus L. and P. vulgaris L. Landraces

Arelly Capistrán-Carabarin, Elia Nora Aquino-Bolaños, Yatzil Denih García-Díaz, José Luis Chávez‐Servia, Araceli M. Vera-Guzmán, José Cruz Carrillo-Rodríguez

Foods · 2019 · 30 citations · 32 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L. is one of the most consumed and documented legumes in regard to its grain composition, but little is known about <i>P. coccineus</i> L. To evaluate and compare the phenolic compound content and antioxidant activity between landraces of <i>P. coccineus</i> and <i>P. vulgaris</i>, a total of 14 accessions of <i>P. coccineus</i> and <i>P. vulgaris</i> were collected from farmers in Oaxaca, Mexico. Based on reference standards and spectrophotometry, the polyphenol, flavonoid and anthocyanin contents were quantified, and the antioxidant activity was determined by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method. The results showed significant differences (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) between species and accessions, where <i>P. coccineus</i> and <i>P. vulgaris</i> significantly differed in their contents of polyphenols, flavonoids, and anthocyanins, as well as their antioxidant activity in the seed coat and cotyledons. Higher concentrations were found in the seed coat than in the cotyledons for both species. <i>P. vulgaris</i> had a higher anthocyanin content in the seed coat and a higher flavonoid content in the cotyledons than <i>P. coccineus</i>, but it did not for the other compounds tested. There was high variability among the accessions that were classified into four phenotypic groups: Two of <i>P. coccineus</i>, one of a <i>P. coccineus-vulgaris</i> mixed group, and one group of <i>P. vulgaris.</i>

References

32