INTERVIEWER ASSESSMENTS OF APPLICANT “FIT”: AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION

Sara L. Rynes, Barry Gerhart

Personnel Psychology · 1990 · 316 citations · 43 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Fit is widely endorsed in hiring, yet its definition and empirical study remain unclear. This study investigates how interviewers evaluate applicants’ general and firm‑specific fit. Interviewers differentiate general from firm‑specific fit, find a firm‑specific component in evaluations, and rate interpersonal skills, goal orientation, and physical attractiveness as fit indicators, while objective qualifications do not. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.

Abstract

Although both strategic management theorists and practicing recruiters endorse selecting applicants on the basis of “fit,” precise delineation of fit in a selection context remains elusive. Moreover, the majority of previous work in this area has been based on anecdotes, case studies, or prescriptions rather than empirical evidence. The present investigation examines interviewers' assessments of job applicants in terms of both general and firm‐specific employability (i.e., fit). Results suggest that (1) assessments of general employability differ from firm‐specific assessments, (2) there is a firm‐specific component to interviewers' evaluations of job applicants, and (3) interpersonal skills, goal orientation, and physical attractiveness contribute to assessments of fit (holding general employability constant), while objective qualifications (e.g., grade point average, extracurricular offices, years experience) do not. Suggestions for future research are offered.

References

43