Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement

George P. Baker

Journal of Political Economy · 1992 · 1.1K citations · 14 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper investigates incentive contracts where the agent’s payoff is independent of the principal’s objective. The authors apply the model to diverse incentive‑contracting scenarios such as gaming of performance measures, revenue‑based sales commissions, and relative performance evaluation. Contracts based on such performance measures generally fail to deliver first‑best incentives, even with risk‑neutral agents, and the optimal contract’s form and efficiency depend on the alignment between the performance measure and the principal’s objective, with a simple statistical metric provided to assess efficiency.

Abstract

This paper examines the characteristics of incentive contracts in which the agent's payoff is not based on the principal's objective. I show that contracts based on such performance measures will not in general provide first-best incentives, even when the agent is risk neutral. The form of the optimal contract and the efficiency of this contract depend on the relationship between the performance measure used and the principal's objective. The model provides a simple and intuitive statistical measure that serves as a metric for the efficiency of a performance measure. Applications to various incentive contracting situations, including the "gaming" of performance measures, the use of revenue-based sales commissions, and relative performance evaluation, are presented.

References

14