Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · 2014 · 14 citations · 18 references
AgricultureAnimal SciencesFood ScienceLivestock ProductionMeat ScienceSensory EvaluationAnimal Product QualityMeat CompositionMeat FlavorMeat QualityMeat TextureTexture QualityAttributesBreed Effects On Meat CompositionBreed Effects On Meat FlavorBreed Effects On Product QualityBreed Effects On TextureHigh Eating QualityLocal BreedsMeat Quality Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Breed or genotype is important to consider for developing appropriate eating quality in lamb. The objectives of this study were to compare physical and chemical parameters and sensory acceptance of longissimus lumborum (LL) muscle from six lamb breed types economically important to the Brazilian sheep-raising chain. RESULTS: No difference (P > 0.05) among samples was found in relation to L(*) , a(*) and b(*) parameters. However, differences were detected in shear force for the LL muscle produced by different breeds (P < 0.05), where animals without definite breed (WDB) showed higher shear force, whereas the lowest levels were observed for breed Hampshire Down, followed by Ile de France and the Dorper/Santa Inês cross-breed (Dorper/SI). In relation to sensory acceptance, no difference (P > 0.05) was detected in aroma attribute for all breed types tested. For the attributes texture, juiciness, flavor and overall quality, differences were detected (P < 0.05), Dorper/SI, Hampshire Down and Suffolk cross breeds received the best scores, while Santa Inês received intermediate evaluations, and Ile de France and WDB were the least accepted. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions evaluated in this study, meat from Dorper/SI and Hampshire Down cross-breeds showed better eating quality, satisfying most consumers.
18
Breed effect on carcase and meat quality of suckling lambs
C. Sañudo, M.M. Campo, I. Sierra et al. · Meat Science · 1997 · 131 citations
Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis
V. Cañeque · Meat Science · 2004 · 124 citations