Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · 2005 · 220 citations · 17 references
AgricultureFood SciencePlant SciencesFruit SciencePomologySensory EvaluationFlavor EvaluationFruit Flavor ChemistryFruit QualityFruit Quality EvaluationFruit TextureSugar AnalysisChemical Quality AttributesCultivar Differences In FlavorFruit Aroma EvaluationFruit Organic AcidsFruit Quality AttributesFruit SugarsFruit Sweetness AssessmentSensory Quality Evaluation
The study examined relationships between sensory and chemical attributes of peach and nectarine fruit quality. The study evaluated and compared sensory attributes and chemical composition of nine peach and nectarine cultivars. Nine cultivars—Maria Marta, Romestar, 325 × A/8, 224 × A/13, V × S/4, Bea, Maria Aurelia, Venus, and Spring Red—were assessed. Sensory ratings identified Maria Aurelia as the best and 224 × A/13 as the worst, with sweetness linked to citric acid, shikimic acid and sugar/acid ratio, aroma to organic acids and sugars, and taste to acid ratios and sugar content, confirming sensory assessment as a reliable proxy for fruit quality. © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.
Abstract Sensory attributes and chemical composition in peach and nectarine fruits of nine different cultivars were evaluated and compared. The cultivars investigated in the research were: ‘Maria Marta’, ‘Romestar’, ‘325 × A/8’, ‘224 × A/13’, ‘V × S/4’, ‘Bea’, ‘Maria Aurelia’, ‘Venus’ and ‘Spring Red’. In sensory evaluation the ‘Maria Aurelia’ was the highest rated, and the ‘224 × A/13’ was the lowest. The cultivars ‘325 × A/8’, ‘224 × A/13’, ‘V × S/4’ and ‘Spring Red’ were poor in sugars; however, the ‘Spring Red’ was rich in organic acids. Similarly, the ‘Maria Aurelia’ and ‘Venus’ fruits had higher contents of organic acids and were also rich in sugars. Furthermore, the relationships among sensory and chemical attributes of fruit quality were studied. The sensory evaluations of sweetness, taste, and aroma were well correlated with some chemically measured attributes of peach and nectarine quality: sweetness was influenced by citric acid, shikimic acid and sugars/organic acids ratio; aroma was correlated with total organic acids, sucrose, sorbitol and malic acid; taste was related to malic/citric acid ratio, total sugars, sucrose, sorbitol and malic acid. The results of the research indicate that sensory evaluation provides a good tool in the quick assessment of peach and nectarine fruit quality. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
17
Encyclopaedia of food science, food technology, and nutrition
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 515 citations
Agriculture, Food Science, Nutrition +17
Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding
C.R. Hampson, H. A. Quamme, John W. Hall et al. · Euphytica · 2000 · 138 citations
C. Aubert, Ziya Günata, Christian Ambid et al. · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2003 · 114 citations