2015 · 105 citations · 9 references
EngineeringAutonomous SystemsRobotics EngineeringHuman-robot InteractionHumanoid RoboticsRoboticsCollision AvoidanceFall DetectionHuman-machine InteractionHuman-robot TeamingRobot SafetySafety In Human-robot InteractionCatastrophic EventsHuman-centered RoboticsOperator ExperienceOperatorsPhysical Human-robot Interaction SafetyRobot Safety DesignSafety-aware ControlVehicle Safety Features
We describe Team WPI-CMU's approach to the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), focusing on our strategy to avoid failures that required physical human intervention. We implemented safety features in our controller to detect potential catastrophic failures, stop the current behavior, and allow remote intervention by a human supervisor. Our safety methods and operator interface worked: we avoided catastrophe and remote operators could safely recover from difficult situations. We were the only team in the DRC Finals that attempted all tasks, scored points (14/16), did not require physical human intervention (a reset), and did not fall in the two missions during the two days of tests. We also had the most consistent pair of runs. Much of the paper discusses lessons learned from the DRC.
9
Capture Point: A Step toward Humanoid Push Recovery
Jerry Pratt, John Carff, S. Drakunov et al. · 2006 · 1.1K citations
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Engineering +13
Decoupled state estimation for humanoids using full-body dynamics
X Xinjilefu, Siyuan Feng, Weiwei Huang et al. · 2014 · 54 citations
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Engineering +17