Journal of Research in Science Teaching · 2002 · 1.9K citations · 47 references
EducationScience EducationTeachingNature Of ScienceScience AssessmentScience InstructionMeasurement In ScienceNature Of Science AssessmentScience PedagogyAssessmentsNature Of Science BeliefsNature Of Science ConceptsNature Of Science InterviewsNature Of Science QuestionnairesNature Of Science ViewsQuestionnaire ValidityViews
K–12 science education aims to develop students’ informed views of the nature of science, yet assessing these views remains a persistent challenge. This article seeks to trace the development of the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS) and outline its underlying NOS framework. The VNOS, an open‑ended instrument complemented by individual interviews, is validated and used to generate rich descriptive NOS profiles for research on teaching and learning. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., J Res Sci Teach 39: 497–521.
Abstract Helping students develop informed views of nature of science (NOS) has been and continues to be a central goal for kindergarten through Grade 12 (K–12) science education. Since the early 1960s, major efforts have been undertaken to enhance K–12 students and science teachers' NOS views. However, the crucial component of assessing learners' NOS views remains an issue in research on NOS. This article aims to (a) trace the development of a new open‐ended instrument, the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS), which in conjunction with individual interviews aims to provide meaningful assessments of learners' NOS views; (b) outline the NOS framework that underlies the development of the VNOS; (c) present evidence regarding the validity of the VNOS; (d) elucidate the use of the VNOS and associated interviews, and the range of NOS aspects that it aims to assess; and (e) discuss the usefulness of rich descriptive NOS profiles that the VNOS provides in research related to teaching and learning about NOS. The VNOS comes in response to some calls within the science education community to go back to developing standardized forced‐choice paper and pencil NOS assessment instruments designed for mass administrations to large samples. We believe that these calls ignore much of what was learned from research on teaching and learning about NOS over the past 30 years. The present state of this line of research necessitates a focus on individual classroom interventions aimed at enhancing learners' NOS views, rather than on mass assessments aimed at describing or evaluating students' beliefs. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 497–521, 2002
47
National Science Education Standards
James H. Shea · Journal of Geological Education · 1995 · 7.9K citations · Full text
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
Mary Hesse, Karl R. Popper · The Philosophical Quarterly · 1965 · 4.2K citations
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
T. W. Hutchison, Karl R. Popper · Economica · 1964 · 4.2K citations
C. Owen Lovejoy · Science · 1981 · 1.4K citations