Journal of Consumer Research · 2011 · 207 citations · 46 references
AgricultureHealth BehaviorPsychologyDietary AssessmentHuman NutritionSensory EvaluationAppetiteConsumer Food ChoiceFood ChoicesFood ConsumptionTaste EvaluationConsumer Attitudes Toward FoodConsumer Food PerceptionsConsumer Food PreferencesConsumer Label UseFood Label InterpretationFood Marketing EffectsHuman Information ProcessingPerceived Healthfulness
Abstract This research explores the impact of merely altering the name of a food on dieters’ and nondieters’ evaluations of the food’s healthfulness and taste, as well as consumption. Four studies demonstrate that when a food is identified by a relatively unhealthy name (e.g., pasta), dieters perceive the item to be less healthful and less tasty than do nondieters. When the identical food is assigned a relatively healthy name (e.g., salad), however, dieting tendency has no effect on product evaluations. This effect, which results in differences in actual food consumption, is explained by nondieters’ insensitivity to food cues as well as dieters’ reliance on cues indicating a lack of healthfulness and tendency to employ heuristic information processing when evaluating foods. These findings contribute to the body of literature that explores both individual and contextual factors that influence food evaluation and consumption.
46
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
Choice Reviews Online · 1992 · 37.2K citations
John T. Cacioppo, Richard E. Petty · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1982 · 5.1K citations