Effect of Paced and Unpaced Practice on Skill Application and Retention: How Much Is Enough?

Normand Péladeau, Jacques Forget, Françoys Gagné

American Educational Research Journal · 2003 · 39 citations · 66 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study compared mastery learning, overlearning, and fluency‑building instructions to assess their effects on academic performance and long‑term retention. Eighteen‑hundred‑sixteen students in introductory quantitative methods practiced weekly with a computerized flash‑card program until meeting mastery criteria. Practicing to mastery increased exam scores, group success, and long‑term retention, with overlearning providing additional long‑term benefits, while fluency‑building had no effect; moreover, more practice correlated with more positive attitudes toward the course and subject.

Abstract

This study examined the relative benefits of mastery learning, overlearning, and fluency-building instructions for academic performance and long-term retention. College students enrolled in introductory quantitative methods classes (n = 168) were asked to practice every week with a computerized flash-card program until they attained various mastery criteria. The results confirmed that practicing until mastery improved individual exam scores, group success rates, and long-term retention. Moreover, overlearning provided additional benefits, especially in long-term retention. However, fluency-building instructions did not further increase academic achievement or long-term retention. Despite the alleged detrimental effects of drill and practice on motivation, a positive relationship was found between amount of practice and attitudes toward the course, the subject matter, and practice activities.

References

66