Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 1997 · 266 citations · 33 references
Life SciencesImmunologyMolecular BiologyEnzymologyProtein BiochemistryProtein TranslationAntigen PresentationAntigen ProcessingProtein DegradationProteolytic EnzymesProteolytic ProcessingMajor Histocompatibility Complex Class I PresentationMajor Histocompatibility Complex Class I RecognitionPeptidase ActivityProtease Cleavage SitesProtease Cleavage SpecificityProteasome InhibitorsProteolytic Enzyme ActivityProteolytic Remodeling
Although cellular proteins degraded by proteasomes are the source of most antigenic peptides presented on major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, it is unknown whether the eight- to nine-residue peptides that fit in the binding groove of class I molecules are directly produced by proteasomes alone in vivo. If the eight-residue peptide SIINFEKL from chicken ovalbumin is extended by one or several residues at its C terminus and microinjected into cells or expressed from a minigene, it is processed and presented on major histocompatibility complex class I. However, processing and presentation are inhibited by proteasome inhibitors, such as lactacystin. In contrast, when SIINFEKL is extended by 2 to 25 residues at its N terminus, its presentation is not blocked by proteasome inhibitors. N-terminal processing also can occur when the extended peptide is cotranslationally inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, two different proteolytic steps in the generation of an chicken ovalbumin-presented peptide can be distinguished. Cleavage by the proteasome defines the proper C terminus, whereas distinct peptidase(s) in the cytosol or endoplasmic reticulum may generate the appropriate N terminus from extended peptides.
33
The structure of HLA-B27 reveals nonamer self-peptides bound in an extended conformation
Dean R. Madden, Joan C. Gorga, Jack L. Strominger et al. · Nature · 1991 · 684 citations