Food and Nutrition Bulletin · 2011 · 917 citations · 27 references
AgricultureNutritional SciencesPlant BreedingCrop ImprovementHuman NutritionMicronutrient NutritionCrop NutritionDietary Sources Of MicronutrientsMicronutrient BioavailabilityMicronutrient Deficiency PreventionMicronutrient ManagementNutritional EnhancementAgronomic BiofortificationBiofortification Of Cereal GrainsBiofortified CropsMicronutrient Content ImprovementNutrient BiofortificationSweet PotatoZinc Biofortification
Biofortification increases mineral and vitamin density in widely consumed staples through conventional breeding or transgenic methods. HarvestPlus aims to develop and distribute iron‑, zinc‑, and provitamin‑A‑rich staple varieties via a global interdisciplinary alliance. Biofortification succeeds when nutrient‑dense, high‑yield, profitable varieties are bred, human studies confirm improved micronutrient status, and farmers adopt and consumers consume the crops. Biofortified crops first reach remote rural populations, then urban markets, complement fortification programs, and early research investments yield low‑cost, high‑benefit returns as varieties spread.
Background The density of minerals and vitamins in food staples eaten widely by the poor may be increased either through conventional plant breeding or through the use of transgenic techniques, a process known as biofortification. Objective HarvestPlus seeks to develop and distribute varieties of food staples (rice, wheat, maize, cassava, pearl millet, beans, and sweet potato) that are high in iron, zinc, and provitamin A through an interdisciplinary, global alliance of scientific institutions and implementing agencies in developing and developed countries. Methods In broad terms, three things must happen for biofortification to be successful. First, the breeding must be successful—high nutrient density must be combined with high yields and high profitability. Second, efficacy must be demonstrated—the micronutrient status of human subjects must be shown to improve when they are consuming the biofortified varieties as normally eaten. Thus, sufficient nutrients must be retained in processing and cooking and these nutrients must be sufficiently bioavailable. Third, the biofortified crops must be adopted by farmers and consumed by those suffering from micronutrient malnutrition in significant numbers. Results Biofortified crops offer a rural-based intervention that, by design, initially reaches these more remote populations, which comprise a majority of the under-nourished in many countries, and then penetrates to urban populations as production surpluses are marketed. In this way, biofortification complements fortification and supplementation programs, which work best in centralized urban areas and then reach into rural areas with good infrastructure. Conclusions Initial investments in agricultural research at a central location can generate high recurrent benefits at low cost as adapted, biofortified varieties become available in country after country across time at low recurrent costs.
27
Natural Genetic Variation in <i>Lycopene Epsilon Cyclase</i> Tapped for Maize Biofortification
Carlos Harjes, Torbert Rocheford, Ling Bai et al. · Science · 2008 · 782 citations · Full text
Jan W. Low, Mary Arimond, Nadia Osman et al. · Journal of Nutrition · 2007 · 565 citations
The economics of iron deficiency
Susan Horton, Jay Ross · Food Policy · 2003 · 501 citations
Paul J. van Jaarsveld, Mieke Faber, Sherry A. Tanumihardjo et al. · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2005 · 397 citations · Full text
Iron-Biofortified Rice Improves the Iron Stores of Nonanemic Filipino Women
Jere D. Haas, John L. Beard, Laura E. Murray‐Kolb et al. · Journal of Nutrition · 2005 · 261 citations · Full text