International Journal of Operations & Production Management · 2002 · 158 citations · 21 references
BusinessOperations ManagementOrganizational BehaviorBusiness StrategyCustomer Relationship ManagementRetail Service ManagementCustomer LoyaltyCustomer SatisfactionStore Operations ManagementStore Performance AnalysisCustomer Contact ManagementEmployee Satisfaction AnalysisFinancial Performance ManagementSatisfactionStore Performance MeasurementStore Performance MetricsSupermarket Operations
This paper challenges the conventional belief that higher employee satisfaction and loyalty drive productivity, efficiency, and profit. The study recommends managers assess the satisfaction–performance link in their own firms and proposes four contextual factors—high customer contact, low technological substitution, staff contact criticality, and high labor costs—that may moderate this relationship. Empirical evidence from a UK supermarket chain shows that higher employee satisfaction and loyalty are associated with lower productivity, efficiency, and profitability, and that efficiency pressures may foster dysfunctional management.
This paper reports some empirical findings which appear to challenge the received wisdom prevailing in the operations management, service management, TQM and HRM literatures, namely, that employee satisfaction and loyalty are key drivers of productivity, efficiency and profit. An empirical study of one of the UK’s four large supermarket chains reveals an inverse correlation between employee satisfaction and the measures of productivity, efficiency and profitability, the most profitable stores being those in which employees are least satisfied. Employee loyalty, measured in terms of length of service, also appears to be inversely correlated with productivity and profitability. It also emerges that the pressure to maximise store efficiency may be leading to dysfunctional managerial behaviour at store level. These preliminary findings suggest two imperatives for managers and academics. For managers, it is advocated that they analyse the relationship between employee satisfaction, loyalty and financial performance in their own organisations rather than assuming that the rhetoric of the management literature applies in all operational contexts. For academics, four contingent variables are proposed which distinguish those service contexts in which the assumed relationship may pertain: services where customer contact with staff is high; services where there is little opportunity for technological substitution; services where staff contact is critical to the customer value proposition; and services with high labour costs.
21
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Valarie A. Zeithaml, Leonard L. Berry, A. Parasuraman · Journal of Marketing · 1996 · 8.7K citations
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Valarie A. Zeithaml, Leonard L. Berry, A. Parasuraman · Journal of Marketing · 1996 · 5.3K citations
Zero defections: quality comes to services.
Frederick F. Reichheld, W. Earl Sasser · PubMed · 1990 · 5.3K citations
Of strategies, deliberate and emergent
Henry Mintzberg, James A. Waters · Strategic Management Journal · 1985 · 4.5K citations
What is total quality control the japanese way
Kaoru Ishikawa · 1985 · 1.8K citations