IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2018 · 48 citations · 18 references
EngineeringComputer ScienceRobotics EngineeringComputational GeometryHumanoid RoboticsRobot KinematicsKinematicsMulti-body DynamicsMultibody DynamicsRiemannian GeometryRigid Body KinematicsSystem IdentificationIll-posed ProblemsInertia Parameter IdentificationInertial Parameter EstimationInertial Parameter IdentificationLeast Squares EstimationParameter IdentificationRiemannian MetricRobot Inertial Parameter Identification
Notwithstanding the seemingly straightforward nature of the inertial parameter identification problem for multibody systems-the most common formulation is as a linear least-squares estimation problem-existing methods, especially for complex high-dof systems subject to nonpersistent and noisy measurements, tend to be highly sensitive to the choice of initial values, and more often than not converge to ad hoc solutions that lie on arbitrary user-specified boundaries. We argue in this letter that such ill-posed behavior is traceable in large part to the use of the standard Euclidean metric in the regularized least-squares error criterion. We instead make use of the fact that the collection of inertial parameters constitutes a Riemannian manifold with a naturally defined Riemannian metric. By formulating and minimizing a coordinate-invariant error criterion based on this natural Riemannian metric, we show that accuracy and robustness of the identification can be vastly improved. Experiments involving high-dof humanoid structures are presented to validate our method and claims.
18
Dragomir Anguelov, Daphne Koller, Sebastian Thrun et al. · ACM Transactions on Graphics · 2005 · 1.6K citations
Manopt, a Matlab toolbox for optimization on manifolds
Nicolas Boumal, Bamdev Mishra, Pierre-Antoine Absil et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013 · 803 citations · Full text
Parameter identification of robot dynamics
Pradeep K. Khosla, Takeo Kanade · 1985 · 375 citations
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Engineering +16