Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research

Susan Fournier

Journal of Consumer Research · 1998 · 790 citations · 6 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Despite the dominance of relationship metaphors in marketing, empirical research on consumer‑brand relational phenomena remains scarce. The article argues that consumer‑brand relationships are valid, proposes a framework and a brand relationship quality concept, and calls for further research to test and refine these ideas. The author uses three in‑depth case studies, interpreted through an integrative review of person‑to‑person relationship literature, to develop the framework. Applying the concepts to brand loyalty and brand personality yields new insights that advance these research areas.

Abstract

Although the relationship metaphor dominates contemporary marketing thought and practice, surprisingly little empirical work has been conducted on relational phenomena in the consumer products domain, particularly at the level of the brand. In this article, the author: (1) argues for the validity of the relationship proposition in the consumer-brand context, including a debate as to the legitimacy of the brand as an active relationship partner and empirical support for the phenomenological significance of consumer-brand bonds; (2) provides a framework for characterizing and better understanding the types of relationships consumers form with brands; and (3) inducts from the data the concept of brand relationship quality, a diagnostic tool for conceptualizing and evaluating relationship strength. Three in-depth case studies inform this agenda, their interpretation guided by an integrative review of the literature on person-to-person relationships. Insights offered through application of inducted concepts to two relevant research domains — brand loyalty and brand personality — are advanced in closing. The exercise is intended to urge fellow researchers to refine, test, and augment the working hypotheses suggested herein and to progress toward these goals with confidence in the validity of the relationship premise at the level of consumers’ lived experiences with their brands.

References

6