The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa: Reflections arising from a workshop for teachers and therapists to introduce Universal Design for Learning

Elizabeth Dalton, Judith McKenzie, Callista Kahonde

African Journal of Disability · 2012 · 131 citations · 18 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

South Africa adopted an inclusive education policy to remove learning barriers, yet its implementation is limited by teachers’ insufficient skills to differentiate curriculum for diverse learners. The paper aims to introduce Universal Design for Learning as a single‑classroom strategy for curriculum differentiation in South Africa’s inclusive schools. To evaluate this approach, the authors organized a workshop with teachers and therapists, presenting UDL principles and gathering feedback on its applicability. Participants judged UDL appropriate and useful, reported that it facilitates teacher‑therapist dialogue, and suggested that further teacher training could expand its use.

Abstract

South Africa has adopted an inclusive education policy in order to address barriers to learning in the education system. However, the implementation of this policy is hampered by the lack of teachers’ skills and knowledge in differentiating the curriculum to address a wide range of learning needs. In this paper we provided a background to inclusive education policy in South Africa and a brief exposition of an instructional design approach, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) that addresses a wide range of learning needs in a single classroom. We reported on a workshop conducted with teachers and therapists in South Africa as a first attempt to introduce UDL in this context. Knowledge of UDL was judged to be appropriate and useful by the course participants in the South African context as a strategy for curriculum differentiation in inclusive classrooms. Furthermore, knowledge of the UDL framework facilitates dialogue between teachers and therapists and provides a relatively simple and comprehensive approach for curriculum differentiation. We therefore conclude that there is potential for this approach that can be expanded through further teacher training.

References

18