Exploring the Relationships Between Tutor Background, Tutor Training, and Student Learning: A Problem-based Learning Meta-Analysis

Heather Leary, Andrew Walker, Brett E. Shelton, M. Harrison Fitt

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning · 2013 · 79 citations · 130 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Despite extensive research on problem‑based learning, no systematic analysis has examined how tutor characteristics influence student learning outcomes. This meta‑analysis aimed to fill that gap by coding 223 outcomes from 94 studies to assess the impact of tutor factors on PBL student gains. The authors aggregated data from 94 studies, coding 223 outcomes and reporting a small but positive overall effect size (g = 0.24). The analysis revealed small but positive overall gains for PBL students, stronger effects in randomized controlled designs, no relationship between tutor content expertise and learning, a negative association between tutor experience and student learning, and highlighted limitations and future research directions.

Abstract

Despite years of primary research on problem-based learning and literature reviews, no systematic effort has been made to analyze the relationship between tutor characteristics and student learning outcomes. In an effort to fill that gap the following meta-analysis coded 223 outcomes from 94 studies with small but positive gains for PBL students (g = 0.24). Specific sub-group analyses indicate randomly controlled designs may be more sensitive to differences that favor PBL students, even while there is no relationship between tutor content expertise and student learning. Perhaps surprisingly, student learning decreases as tutor experience increases. Limitations and future work are discussed within a context of scholarly and practical significance.

References

130