Academy of Management Journal · 2006 · 743 citations · 43 references
BusinessCorporate GovernanceStrategic ManagementAgency TheoryContract TheoryContractsContract DesignContract ManagementInformation AsymmetryOptimal ContractingRelational ContractsTransaction Cost EconomicsContract GovernanceFormal ContractingInterorganizational SystemsNew Product Development GovernanceOpportunism In ContractingRelational Contract TheoryRobust Contracting
Comparing the effectiveness of contractual and relational governance in constraining opportunism under conditions of volatility and ambiguity, we hypothesize that relational contracts will be robust to volatility but not to ambiguity, whereas formal contracts will be robust to ambiguity but not to volatility. Data from 125 interorganizational relationships involving R&D for new-product development support these hypotheses. Our findings suggest that formal and relational contracts each have advantages and disadvantages in specific situations and are not simply substitutes. Our results challenge the view that relational contracts are resistant to opportunism. A revised comparative governance schema is theorized for future research. © Academy of Management Journal.
43
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management
David J. Teece, Gary P. Pisano, Amy Shuen · Strategic Management Journal · 1997 · 31.5K citations
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
James J. Heckman · Econometrica · 1979 · 28.9K citations
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Mark Granovetter · American Journal of Sociology · 1985 · 28.2K citations