Journal of Food Protection · 2020 · 12 citations · 47 references
AgricultureFood ScienceMicrobiologyAntimicrobial ResistanceFood MicrobiologyFood SafetyAntibiotic ResistanceFoodborne PathogensMeat SafetyMicrobial ContaminationMicrobial Food SafetyMicrobiological Food SafetyAntimicrobial Resistance In Food BacteriaAntimicrobial Resistance In Foodborne BacteriaEscherichia ColiEscherichia Coli ResistanceMeat Microbial Risk AssessmentMeat Microbiological ContaminationMicrobial Safety Of MeatMicrobiological Meat Safety
ABSTRACT: Consumption of animal-derived meat products is suspected as an important exposure route to antimicrobial resistance, as the presence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) along the beef supply chain is well documented. A retail-to-fork quantitative exposure assessment was established to compare consumers' exposure to various ARB due to the consumption of ground beef with and without "raised without antibiotics" claims and to inform potential exposure mitigation strategies related to consumer practices. The microbial agents evaluated included Escherichia coli, tetracycline-resistant (TETr) E. coli, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli,Salmonella enterica, TETrS. enterica, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant S. enterica, nalidixic acid-resistant S. enterica, Enterococcus spp., TETrEnterococcus spp., erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. The final model outputs were the probability of exposure to at least 0 to 6 log CFU microorganisms per serving of ground beef at the time of consumption. It was estimated that tetracycline resistance was more prevalent in ground beef compared with other types of resistance, among which the predicted average probability of ingesting TETrEnterococcus was highest (6.2% of ingesting at least 0 log CFU per serving), followed by TETrE. coli (3.1%) and TETrSalmonella (0.0001%), given common product purchase preferences and preparation behaviors among beef consumers in the United States. The effectiveness of consumer-related interventions was estimated by simulating the differences in exposure as a result of changes in consumer practices in purchasing, handling, and preparing ground beef. The results indicated that proper use of recommended safe cooking and food preparation practices mitigates ARB exposure more effectively than choosing raised without antibiotics compared with conventional beef.
47
Modeling of the Bacterial Growth Curve
M.H. Zwietering, I. Jongenburger, F.M. Rombouts et al. · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · 1990 · 4.2K citations · Full text
Development of the Human Infant Intestinal Microbiota
Chana Palmer, Elisabeth M. Bik, Daniel B. DiGiulio et al. · PLoS Biology · 2007 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Microbiology +17
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
Vanessa M. D’Costa, Christine King, Lindsay Kalan et al. · Nature · 2011 · 2.7K citations
Hidenori Hayashi, Rei Takahashi, Takahiro Nishi et al. · Journal of Medical Microbiology · 2005 · 356 citations