IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2020 · 36 citations · 38 references
EngineeringComputer EngineeringElectrical EngineeringCircuit TheorySemiconductor DevicesSimulation-based DesignDevice CharacterizationDevice ModelingDevice SimulationHardware Modeling For Digital SystemsMemory ModelingDevice VariabilityMemory Device SimulationPhysics-based SimulationResistive Random-access MemoryResistive SwitchingSwitching DevicesVariability AnalysisVariability Modeling
Intrinsic variability observed in resistive-switching devices (cycle-to-cycle and device-to-device) is widely recognised as a major hurdle for widespread adoption of Resistive RAM technology. While physics-based models have been developed to accurately reproduce the resistive-switching behaviour, reproducing the observed variability behavior of a specific RRAM has not been studied. Without a properly fitted variability in the model, the simulation error introduced at the device-level propagates through circuit-level to system-level simulations in an unpredictable manner. In this work, we propose an algorithm to fit a certain amount of variability to an existing physics-based analytical model (Stanford-PKU model). The extent of variability exhibited by the device is fitted to the model in a manner agnostic to the cause of variability. Further, the model is modified to better reproduce the variations observed in a device. The model, fitted with variability can well reproduce cycle-to-cycle, as well as device-to-device variations. The significance of integrating variability into RRAM models is underscored using a sensing example.
38
Recommended Methods to Study Resistive Switching Devices
Mario Lanza, H.‐S. Philip Wong, Eric Pop et al. · Advanced Electronic Materials · 2018 · 650 citations · Full text