Counteracting skill decay: four refresher interventions and their effect on skill and knowledge retention in a simulated process control task

Annette Kluge, Barbara Frank

Ergonomics · 2014 · 63 citations · 33 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study systematically investigates skill decay in process automation by examining the effects of refresher interventions on a simulated process control task. Two experimental studies compared four refresher interventions—Practice, Skill Demonstration, Symbolic Rehearsal, and Procedural Knowledge Test—designed from proceduralisation, testing‑effect, and mental practice theories to support skill and knowledge retention during a start‑up procedure. Both skill‑based and knowledge‑based interventions improved retention, but Skill Demonstration increased mental workload and Procedural Knowledge Test led to moderate skill decay, indicating that refresher interventions should be matched to task requirements.

Abstract

In process automation, skill decay has not been investigated systematically. In two experimental studies, refresher interventions (RIs) were compared to support skill and knowledge retention of a start-up procedure on a simulated process control task. Based on theories of proceduralisation, the 'testing-effect' and mental practice, four different RIs were designed. In Study 1 (N = 68), two experimental groups (EGs) received either an RI called 'Practice' or an RI called 'Skill Demonstration'. Both RIs support skill retention, but the Skill Demonstration-RI performed with a higher mental workload. In Study 2 (N = 68), two EGs received an RI called 'Symbolic Rehearsal' or an RI called 'Procedural Knowledge Test', and aimed at supporting knowledge retention. Both EGs supported knowledge retention but showed moderate skill decay. Results imply that RIs affect skill and knowledge retention differently and should be applied in accordance with the task requirements and their dependence on accurate skill or knowledge maintenance.

References

33