Setting Performance Standards on Complex Educational Assessments

Ronald K. Hambleton, Richard M. Jaeger, Barbara S. Plake, Craig N. Mills

Applied Psychological Measurement · 2000 · 91 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Performance assessments are increasingly used in education and credentialing, and performance standards are commonly applied to interpret and report scores, but their unique polytomous scoring characteristics render traditional standard‑setting methods inadequate. The authors review several promising methods for establishing performance standards, evaluating each method’s strengths and weaknesses. They conclude by proposing directions for future research to refine and validate these standard‑setting approaches.

Abstract

Performance assessments have become popular in education and credentialing, and performance standards are common for interpreting and reporting scores. However, because of the unique characteristics of these assessments compared to multiple-choice tests (such as polytomous scoring), new and validstandard-setting methods are needed. Well-known standard-setting methods are no longer applicable. A number of promising methods for setting performance standards are described and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed. Suggestions for additional research are offered.

References

17