LEARNING WITHIN A LEARNER CONTROL TRAINING ENVIRONMENT: THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GOAL ORIENTATION AND METACOGNITIVE INSTRUCTION ON LEARNING OUTCOMES

Aaron M. Schmidt, J. Kevin Ford

Personnel Psychology · 2003 · 357 citations · 72 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study proposes that engaging in metacognitive activities is essential for success in high learner‑control training environments. The authors developed a model examining how goal orientation and a metacognitive training intervention interact to influence metacognitive activity and learning outcomes, and tested it with 79 participants in a web‑based web‑page design course. Results showed that higher metacognitive activity during training led to greater declarative knowledge, better skill performance, and higher self‑efficacy, partially mediated the link between goal orientation and outcomes, and revealed that the intervention benefited low performance‑avoidance learners while reducing activity among highly avoidant trainees.

Abstract

This study proposes that effective engagement in metacognitive activities is critical to success in high learner‐control training environments. A model was developed that focuses on the interactive effects of goal orientation and a metacognitive training intervention on metacognitive activity and learning outcomes. Seventy‐nine participants completed a Web‐based training course on how to create Web pages. Consistent with expectations, learners reporting greater levels of metacognitive activity during training gained more declarative knowledge, performed better on a skill‐based measure, and had higher levels of self‐efficacy. Metacognitive activity was also found to partially mediate the relationship between goal orientation and learning outcomes. Finally, the expected goal orientation by intervention interaction was found. The metacognitive intervention was beneficial in enhancing metacognitive activity for trainees with low performance‐avoidance orientations, but resulted in lower metacognitive activity among highly avoidant learners. Implications of these findings for research on self‐regulation and training practice are discussed.

References

72