eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · 2005 · 25 citations · 10 references
EducationMathematics EducationTeacher EducationCurriculum DevelopmentFormative AssessmentPedagogyMathematics PedagogyNumeracy DevelopmentTeacher EvaluationTeacher Professional DevelopmentIn-service Professional DevelopmentMathematics Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development MeasurementTeacher Knowledge DevelopmentTeacher Professional Development Evaluation
This paper reports on the use of a profiling instrument to evaluate an in-service professional development program for teachers of middle school numeracy. Two aspects of the use of the profile are reported. One relates to the aims of the profile to reflect Lee Shulman’s seven types of teacher knowledge and to measure change in teachers with respect to them. The second relates to the success of the program and how this was judged from responses to the profile. Although the providers of the program were mainly interested in this second aspect, mathematics educators more generally should be more interested in the first due to recent trends to demand evidence-based evaluations of teacher professional development programs. From the time of the seminal work of Shulman (1987a, 1987b), there has been considerable focus on the seven aspects of teacher knowledge that he argued were important: content knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge, curriculum knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, knowledge of students as learners, knowledge of education contexts, and knowledge of education ends, purposes and values. Various studies have focussed on one or more of these
10
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
Journal of Environmental Psychology · 1994 · 45.6K citations
Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform
Lee S. Shulman · Harvard Educational Review · 1987 · 16.4K citations · Full text