Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 1997 · 127 citations · 11 references
Open access
Computer use has expanded rapidly, prompting educators to seek authentic assessments that often rely on paper‑and‑pencil, yet students increasingly comfortable with computer writing may have their abilities underestimated by such tests. The study investigates how computer versus paper‑and‑pencil administration affects middle‑school students’ scores on multiple‑choice and written tests. A small experimental study compared students’ performance on multiple‑choice and written items administered on computer versus paper‑and‑pencil. Results indicate that while multiple‑choice scores are similar across modes, students comfortable with computer writing achieve substantially higher written‑test scores on the computer (effect size 0.9, 67 % vs 30 %).
Computer use has grown rapidly during the past decade. Within the educational community, interest in authentic assessment has also increased. To enhance the authenticity of tests of writing, as well as of other knowledge and skills, some assessments require students to respond in written form via paper-and-pencil. However, as increasing numbers of students grow accustomed to writing on computers, these assessments may yield underestimates of students' writing abilities. This article presents the findings of a small study examining the effect that mode of administration -computer versus paper-and-pencil -has on middle school students' performance on multiple-choice and written test questions. Findings show that, though multiple-choice test results do not differ much by mode of administration, for students accustomed to writing on computer, responses written on computer are substantially higher than those written by hand (effect size of 0.9 and relative success rates of 67% versus 30%). Implications are discussed in terms of both future research and test validity.
11
Digest of Education Statistics
Choice Reviews Online · 2014 · 6.3K citations
Parametric measures of effect size.
Robert Rosenthal · 1994 · 1.6K citations