Journal of Education · 2009 · 925 citations · 59 references
EducationInstructionLiteracy EducationReading ComprehensionReading DevelopmentReading EducationLiteracy InstructionReadingReading AcquisitionReading InstructionReading StrategiesText ComprehensionComprehension-based InstructionOral Reading PracticeReading Comprehension InterventionReading Comprehension Strategies
Reading comprehension research has a long history, with most advances since 1975, grounded in studies of good readers that illuminate effective instruction and comprehension processes. The study seeks to explain why rapid progress has been achieved in reading comprehension research. The authors argue that rapid progress is partly due to the absence of controversy and acrimony in reading comprehension instruction research, unlike other reading domains.
Reading comprehension research has a long and rich history. There is much that we can say about both the nature of reading comprehension as a process and about effective reading comprehension instruction. Most of what we know has been learned since 1975. Why have we been able to make so much progress so fast? We believe that part of the reason behind this steep learning curve has been the lack of controversy about teaching comprehension. Unlike decoding, oral reading, and reading readiness, those who study reading comprehension instruction have avoided much of the acrimony characteristic of work in other aspects of reading. As it should be, much work on the process of reading comprehension has been grounded in studies of good readers. We know a great deal about what good readers do when they read:
59
Choice Reviews Online · 1991 · 6.9K citations · Full text
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Walter Kintsch, Teun A. van Dijk · Psychological Review · 1978 · 5K citations