Publication | Closed Access
An Analysis of the Market Share-Profitability Relationship
387
Citations
18
References
1993
Year
Firm PerformanceBusiness ProfitabilityMarket Share-profitability FindingsCompetitive AdvantageMarket Share-profitability RelationshipCorporate StrategyManagementEconomic AnalysisEconomic ProfitMarket ShareCustomer ProfitabilityMergers And AcquisitionsResource-based ViewAccountingStrategic ManagementMarketingFinanceFinancial EconomicsBusinessBusiness StrategyMarket Power
Researchers in marketing, management, and economics have questioned the validity and generalizability of reported market share‑profitability relationships. The authors conducted a meta‑analysis of 276 findings from 48 studies to test whether market share and profitability are positively related and to identify moderating factors. They performed a meta‑analysis of 276 market share‑profitability findings from 48 studies, evaluating the relationship and its moderators. The meta‑analysis shows that market share generally has a positive effect on profitability, but the strength of this relationship is moderated by model specification errors, sample and measurement characteristics, firm‑specific intangible factors in profit models, and analyses of non‑PIMS businesses, potentially making the relationship artifactual.
A number of researchers in the marketing, management, and economics disciplines have expressed reservations regarding the validity and generalizability of the reported relationships between market share and profitability. Against this backdrop, the authors performed a meta-analysis on 276 market share-profitability findings from forty-eight studies to address whether market share and profitability are positively related and to examine the factors that moderate the magnitude of that relationship. The authors found that, on average, market share has a positive effect on business profitability. However, the magnitude of the market share-profitability relationship is moderated by model specification errors, sample characteristics, and measurement characteristics. The relationship is moderated the most (and, on average, the relationship could be artifactual) when firm-specific intangible factors are specified in the profit model or the estimate of the market share-profitability relationship is based on an analysis of non-PIMS businesses. The authors discuss the implications of these results for the evaluation and utilization of market share information by managers in reference to strategies that focus on building market share as a means for increasing profits.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1