The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Self-Efficacy of Baccalaureate Nursing Students

Sandra Madorin, Carroll Iwasiw

Journal of Nursing Education · 1999 · 82 citations · 23 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Computer‑assisted instruction has become more common, yet educators question its effectiveness, especially as higher self‑efficacy is linked to better motivation and performance. The study aimed to determine whether a computerized simulation of a surgical patient would increase baccalaureate nursing students’ self‑efficacy for caring for surgical patients in the clinical environment. A quasi‑experimental design with 23 second‑year students randomly assigned to experimental and control groups measured self‑efficacy at pretest, after the simulation, and after an 8‑week clinical rotation, with the control group measured only at pretest and after rotation. Students in the experimental group showed significantly higher preclinical self‑efficacy scores (p < .01), supporting the use of CAI in clinical education and highlighting implications for nursing education, practice, and research.

Abstract

ABSTRACT As computer-assisted instruction (CAI) use has increased during the past few years, nurse educators have expressed concern regarding its effectiveness. The purpose of this quasiexperimental study was to determine if completion of a computerized simulation about a surgical patient increased baccalaureate nursing students' self-efficacy about caring for surgical patients in the clinical environment. Such an association is desirable because increased levels of self-efficacy have been associated with increased motivation, goal-setting, and achievement. A nonprobability, convenience sample (N = 23) of second-year baccalaureate nursing students was assigned randomly to experimental and control groups. The self-efficacy of the experimental group was measured three times: on an initial pretest; following the intervention of a computer simulation; and after an 8-week clinical rotation. The self-efficacy of the control group was measured on an initial pretest and after the 8-week rotation. Higher preclinical self-efficacy scores (p &lt; .01) of the experimental group support the use of CAI as an important aspect of clinical education. Implications for nursing education, practice, and research are addressed.

References

23