The Lancet Planetary Health · 2021 · 192 citations · 16 references
Life SciencesNutritionNutritional SciencesDietary AssessmentHuman NutritionNutritional EpidemiologyDiet-disease AssociationsDietary Pattern AnalysisFood GroupsFood IntakeHousehold Food Consumption SurveysNutrition EpidemiologyCross-sectional Food SurveysDietary EpidemiologyEnvironmental Impact IndicatorsEnvironmental IndicatorsMultivariable Regression AnalysisNutrition Survey MethodologyProcessed Meat IntakeRed Meat Intake
BACKGROUND: High meat consumption, particularly red meat and processed meat, negatively affects our health, while meat production is one of the largest contributors to global warming and environmental degradation. The aim of our study was to explore trends in meat consumption within the UK and the associated changes in environmental impact. We also aimed to identify any differences in intake associated with gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and year of birth. METHODS: Our study aimed to describe consumption of red, white, and processed meat within the UK, using data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme (2008-09 to 2018-19), and the associated changes in environmental impact. Meat consumption was based on disaggregated meat data, from 4 day food diaries that excluded all non-meat components of composite dishes. For each year surveyed, trends for meat intake were reported as mean grams per capita per day and linear-regression models were used to test for trends. We used multivariable linear-regression models to examine differences among consumers, as a percentage of food energy, by gender, ethnicity, equivalised household income, and year of birth. FINDINGS: =0·0027) in white-meat consumption. Collectively, these changes were associated with a significant reduction in all six environmental indicators over the whole period. The two middle birth-year groups (people born in 1960-79 and 1980-99) and White individuals were the highest meat consumers. Meat intake increased over time among people born after 1999, was unchanged among Asian and Asian British populations, and decreased in all other population subgroups. We found no difference in intake with gender or household income. INTERPRETATION: Despite the overall reduction in meat intake, reaching meat-consumption targets that align with sustainable diets will require a substantial acceleration of this trend. FUNDING: The Wellcome Trust, Our Planet Our Health programme (Livestock, Environment, and People).
16
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits
Marco Springmann, Michael Clark, Daniel Mason-D’Croz et al. · Nature · 2018 · 3.2K citations · Full text
Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat
Véronique Bouvard, Dana Loomis, Kathryn Z. Guyton et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2015 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods
Michael Clark, Marco Springmann, Jason Hill et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2019 · 833 citations · Full text