Lateral reading: College students learn to critically evaluate internet sources in an online course

Joel Breakstone, Mark D. Smith, Priscilla Connors, Teresa Ortega, Darby Kerr, Sam Wineburg

Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · 2021 · 84 citations · 21 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The COVID‑19 pandemic has increased students’ online activity, yet many struggle to distinguish fact from fiction, and limited evidence suggests that face‑to‑face instruction can improve credibility judgments. The study investigates whether asynchronous remote instruction can enhance students’ ability to evaluate online sources. In an asynchronous college nutrition course, modules taught students to vet websites using fact‑checker strategies, especially lateral reading—leaving an unknown site to consult other sources for evaluation. Students’ scores improved significantly from pre‑test to post‑test, and they engaged in lateral reading more frequently after the intervention, supporting broader implementation in higher education.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced college students to spend more time online. Yet many studies show that college students struggle to discern fact from fiction on the Internet. A small body of research suggests that students in face-to-face settings can improve at judging the credibility of online sources. But what about asynchronous remote instruction? In an asynchronous college nutri-tion course at a large state university, we embedded modules that taught students how to vet web-sites using fact checkers’ strategies. Chief among these strategies was lateral reading, the act of leaving an unknown website to consult other sources to evaluate the original site. Students im-proved significantly from pretest to posttest, engaging in lateral reading more often post interven-tion. These findings inform efforts to scale this type of intervention in higher education.

References

21