Personnel Review · 2007 · 109 citations · 28 references
ManagementBusiness EconomicsHuman Resource ManagementStrategic Human Resource ManagementTalent ManagementWorkplace LearningEmployee DevelopmentEmployee TrainingEmployee Turnover AnalysisHuman Resource DevelopmentOn-the-job TrainingPersonnel EconomicsInvestment In TrainingProbit RegressionProfitability DriversProfitability MetricsReturns To TrainingTrainingTraining Participation
The study uses an international dataset to examine how firm‑specific HRM practices determine employee training and how training investments affect company performance, providing extensive internal measures across 26 countries. The authors analyze data from 5,824 private‑sector firms with OLS and Probit regressions to assess the determinants of training and its link to profitability. Findings show that training provision is largely driven by HRM practices, incidence and intensity are governed by distinct factors, staff turnover has limited influence on training but is associated with lower profitability, and training intensity is the most important determinant of profitability, outweighing staff turnover costs.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to use an international dataset to examine what determines employee training from an organisational perspective, and to what extent training investments enhance company performance. Design/methodology/approach Data from 5,824 private‐sector organisations are used to examine determinants of training and the connection between training and profitability. OLS regressions and Probit estimates are used in the statistical analyses. Findings The results indicate that the provision of company training is largely determined by firm‐specific factors, such as human resource management (HRM) practices. The results further show that two widely used measures of training – incidence and intensity – are largely determined by different factors. Staff turnover (mobility) does not appear to be a decisive factor in explaining the provision of training on a national or company level, although it is associated with lower profitability to some extent. However, the single most important factor associated with profitability is how much is invested in training (intensity), suggesting that the economic benefits of training outweigh the cost of staff turnover. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing training literature by offering extensive access to internal measures of training, profitability, HRM practices, workforce characteristics and staff turnover for companies in 26 countries worldwide.
28
Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis
Gary S. Becker · Journal of Political Economy · 1962 · 7.9K citations
Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labour Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Jörn‐Steffen Pischke · The Economic Journal · 1999 · 1.1K citations