A reception study on non-professional subtitling: Do audiences notice any difference?

David Orrego-Carmona

Across Languages and Cultures · 2016 · 55 citations · 24 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The rise of non‑professional subtitling is driven by audiences’ desire to avoid waiting for official releases and the easy availability of subtitling tools online, yet little is known about how viewers receive and understand such subtitles. The study investigates audience reception of TV series subtitles produced by professional versus non‑professional sources. Fifty‑two participants viewed three excerpts of *The Big Bang Theory* subtitled in three versions (professional DVD and two non‑professional community productions) while completing questionnaires, eye‑tracking, and interview protocols. The study found that non‑professional subtitles do not harm audience reception, with some non‑professional translations matching professional quality, as revealed by eye‑tracking and self‑reported data.

Abstract

The audience’s reluctance to wait for the international release of audiovisual products, coupled with the easy access to audiovisual material and subtitling tools on the Internet, has triggered an increase in the production and use of non-professional subtitling. However, up to now, we know little of how people receive the subtitles and how much they understand when watching products with non-professional subtitles. This paper presents the results of a study that explores the audience reception of subtitled TV series using professional and non-professional subtitling. Fifty-two participants were shown three excerpts from The Big Bang Theory with three subtitled versions: the professional version extracted from the Spanish DVD and two non-professional versions produced by two different nonprofessional subtitling communities. Data were collected through questionnaires, eye tracking and interviews. The results show that non-professional subtitles do not necessarily affect audience reception negatively. Further, both eye tracking and self-reported data yielded interesting insights into audience reception. Based on the findings, it is possible to say that there are non-professional translations that are as good as their professional counterparts.

References

24