Publication | Open Access
Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units?
178
Citations
23
References
2003
Year
Nonword ReadingLanguage DevelopmentAtypical Language DevelopmentPsycholinguisticsGrain SizePhonologyLanguage LearningSecond Language AcquisitionReading ComprehensionChild LanguageGerman ChildrenLanguage AcquisitionReadingLanguage StudiesLanguage-based ApproachHealth SciencesCognitive ScienceSpeech ProductionPhonological AwarenessEnglish ChildrenBilingual PhonologyOrthographyPhonology MorphologyLanguage SciencePhonicsLanguage ComprehensionSpeech PerceptionLinguistics
In inconsistent orthographies such as English, readers are expected to flexibly use spelling‑sound correspondences at multiple unit sizes, whereas in consistent orthographies like German, readers rely mainly on small‑grapheme‑phoneme strategies. The study compared English and German children in a cross‑language blocking experiment that presented nonwords requiring either small‑unit or large‑unit grapheme‑phoneme decoding, either mixed together or blocked by unit size. English children showed blocking effects—better performance when nonwords were blocked by type—indicating they switch between small‑ and large‑unit processing in mixed lists, whereas German children did not, reflecting differences in the grain size of their phonological recoding mechanisms.
It was predicted that children learning to read inconsistent orthographies (e.g., English) should show considerable flexibility in making use of spelling–sound correspondences at different unit sizes whereas children learning to read consistent orthographies (e.g., German) should mainly employ small-size grapheme–phoneme strategies. This hypothesis was tested in a cross-language blocking experiment using nonwords that could only be read using small-size grapheme–phoneme correspondences (small-unit nonwords) and phonologically identical nonwords that could be decoded using larger correspondences (large-unit nonwords). These small-unit and large-unit nonwords were either presented mixed together in the same lists or blocked by unit size. It was found that English children, but not German children, showed blocking effects (better performance when items were blocked by nonword type than in mixed lists). This suggests that in mixed lists, English readers have to switch back and forth between small-unit and large-unit processing, resulting in switching costs. These results are interpreted in terms of differences concerning the grain size of the phonological recoding mechanisms developed by English and German children.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1