Genome biology · 2013 · 451 citations · 33 references
Life SciencesBioinformaticsBiologyGenome AssemblyGenomicsSequence AnalysisAssembly ValidationDe Novo Genome AssemblyDna SequencingGenome SequencingSequence AssemblyAssembly ComparisonAssembly Completeness EvaluationAssembly EvaluationAssembly Quality AssessmentCompletenessGenome Assembly Error CorrectionQuantitative Assemblage ComparisonReference Sequence Curation
Methods to reliably assess the accuracy of genome sequence data are lacking. Currently completeness is only described qualitatively and mis-assemblies are overlooked. Here we present REAPR, a tool that precisely identifies errors in genome assemblies without the need for a reference sequence. We have validated REAPR on complete genomes or de novo assemblies from bacteria, malaria and Caenorhabditis elegans, and demonstrate that 86% and 82% of the human and mouse reference genomes are error-free, respectively. When applied to an ongoing genome project, REAPR provides corrected assembly statistics allowing the quantitative comparison of multiple assemblies. REAPR is available at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/software/reapr/.
33
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Heng Li, Alec Wysoker, Tim Fennell et al. · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 67.5K citations · Full text
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
Eric S. Lander, Lauren Linton, Bruce W. Birren et al. · Nature · 2001 · 24.6K citations · Full text
Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics
Martin Krzywinski, Jacqueline E. Schein, İnanç Birol et al. · Genome Research · 2009 · 11.9K citations · Full text
Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs
Daniel R. Zerbino, Ewan Birney · Genome Research · 2008 · 9.7K citations · Full text