Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions

613

Citations

108

References

2007

Year

TLDR

Peer tutoring has been shown to confer academic benefits, yet the magnitude of tutor learning gains is often modest across settings. This review investigates how tutors’ behaviors influence learning outcomes and offers guidance for future research and training to enhance tutor learning. The authors analyze explaining and questioning as core tutoring activities that promote reflective knowledge‑building through self‑monitoring, integration of prior and new knowledge, and elaboration. The review confirms that these activities can support learning but also reveals a pervasive knowledge‑telling bias, with tutors focusing on delivering content rather than developing it, thereby limiting the full potential of tutor learning.

Abstract

Prior research has established that peer tutors can benefit academically from their tutoring experiences. However, although tutor learning has been observed across diverse settings, the magnitude of these gains is often underwhelming. In this review, the authors consider how analyses of tutors’ actual behaviors may help to account for variation in learning outcomes and how typical tutoring behaviors may create or undermine opportunities for learning. The authors examine two tutoring activities that are commonly hypothesized to support tutor learning: explaining and questioning. These activities are hypothesized to support peer tutors’ learning via reflective knowledge-building, which includes self-monitoring of comprehension, integration of new and prior knowledge, and elaboration and construction of knowledge. The review supports these hypotheses but also finds that peer tutors tend to exhibit a pervasive knowledge-telling bias. Peer tutors, even when trained, focus more on delivering knowledge rather than developing it. As a result, the true potential for tutor learning may rarely be achieved. The review concludes by offering recommendations for how future research can utilize tutoring process data to understand how tutors learn and perhaps develop new training methods.

References

YearCitations

Page 1