Journal of Mechanical Design · 2005 · 24 citations · 19 references
EngineeringDesignMechanical EngineeringComputer-aided DesignDesign OptimizationMechanical DesignConceptual DesignEngine DesignKinematic ConstraintsKinematic DesignKinematicsMechanical System DesignDesign ConstraintsFunctional Requirements AnalysisFunctional Requirements ElicitationKinematic Chain AnalysisKinematic Chain ModelingKinematic JointsKinematic StructureMechanism Synthesis
The paper proposes a methodology that parses design specifications into functional requirements, structural requirements, and design constraints to systematically guide designers through conceptual mechanism design. The approach builds a functioning kinematic chain from functional requirements, searches admissible kinematic structures from atlases using structural requirements, identifies compatible structures sharing segments with the chain, and labels joints under design constraints to produce feasible mechanisms. An illustrative example is the variable‑stroke engine mechanism described by Freudenstein and Maki (1983) in ASME J.
In this paper, design specifications for the conceptual design of mechanisms are parsed into three coherent categories: functional requirements, structural requirements, and design constraints. Based on functional requirements, the functioning kinematic chain of a mechanism can be constructed by connecting the functioning links accordingly. From structural requirements, admissible kinematic structures are searched from the existing atlases of kinematic structures. Those admissible kinematic structures, which comprise at least one segment with the same characteristics of the functioning kinematic chain, are identified as compatible kinematic structures. Thus, feasible mechanisms that fulfill design specifications can be yielded by labeling joints in the compatible kinematic structures subject to design constraints. With this methodology, classified design specifications are used to guide designer through various stages of the conceptual design process in a systematic manner. The creation of the variable-stroke engine mechanism [Freudenstein, F., Maki, E. R., 1983, “Development of an Optimum Variable-Stroke Internal-Combustion Engine Mechanism From the Viewpoint of Kinematic Structure,” ASME J. Mech., Trans., Automat., Des., Vol. 105, pp. 259–267] is used as an illustrative example.
19
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
Students Quarterly Journal · 1963 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Arts, Design, Systems Engineering +12
Choice Reviews Online · 1992 · 2.2K citations
Engineering design — A systematic approach
K.L. Edwards · Materials & Design (1980-2015) · 1995 · 2.1K citations
Arts, Design, Systems Engineering +12