Management Decision · 2006 · 32 citations · 10 references
ManagementStrategic ManagementStrategyDecision MakingStrategic Decision-makingStrategic PlanningDecision Making In OrganizationsOrganizational Decision-makingOrganizational StrategyStrategic ThinkingStrategy FormulationImportance MeasuresImportance PrioritizationImportance RatingsLevelsMulti-stakeholder Decision-makingStrategic Problem StructuringStrategy-structure Fit
Purpose Researchers are keenly searching methods of analyzing, developing and implementing multi‐focused strategies. This is a challenging task because they are quite difficult to structure and, therefore, to assimilate. This study aims to present a new method that can be used further to assist decision‐makers in analyzing, evaluating and structuring strategies. Design/methodology/approach In this constructive case study, an illustrative sand cone model of the different levels and their relative importance ratings is developed using the AHP method. In total, 21 experts in strategies and tactics were involved in the three‐stage model development process. Findings With the help of this visualization model, implementation of a multi‐focused strategy in the case study organization was found to have a better fit for strategic decision making. Originality/value This is a unique research paper.
10
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt · Academy of Management Review · 1989 · 23.2K citations · Full text
Organizational Culture and Leadership
William G. Tierney, Edgar H. Schein · Academy of Management Review · 1986 · 9.7K citations
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Raymond E. Miles, Charles C. Snow, Alan D. Meyer et al. · Academy of Management Review · 1978 · 7.1K citations