The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning

Steve Kennewell, Gary Beauchamp

Learning Media and Technology · 2007 · 173 citations · 6 references

Concepts

TL;DR

In a small‑scale ICT‑rich primary school study, interactive whiteboards were the predominant ICT tool used by teachers, yet existing ICT function lists failed to capture all aspects of their influence. The study aimed to determine how teachers employed ICT features to enhance learning, guided by a published list of ICT functions for teacher education. Researchers collected interview and observation data on digital whiteboard use, analyzed it with an activity‑settings framework, and identified pedagogical actions and teachers’ perceptions of their impact. The analysis produced a two‑level taxonomy of ICT features—intrinsic to media/devices and constructed by designers and teachers—demonstrated its use for cross‑subject practice comparison, and highlighted its value for future research and resource design.

Abstract

In a small‐scale study of Information and Communication Technology (ICT)‐rich primary school, interactive whiteboards (IWBs) were found to be the predominant ICT tools used by teachers. The study sought to identify how the teachers used features of ICT to enhance learning, based on a list of ICT's functions published for teacher education programmes. This list did not appear to account for all the aspects of the IWB's influence that were described by teachers and observed in their lessons. Interview and observation data concerning digital whiteboard technology were probed further, using a framework for analysing activity settings designed for teaching and learning. This process generated a new taxonomy of features of ICT involving two levels: those intrinsic to digital media and devices and those constructed by hardware designers, software developers and teachers preparing resources for learning. Pedagogical actions supported by these features were identified and views concerning the impact of these actions on learning were analysed. This article reports the findings of the analysis, and exemplifies a use of the taxonomy in comparing practice across subjects. It suggests that this focus on ICT's features may be valuable for both future research on the impact of ICT on learning and the design of new ICT resources.

References

6