Minding your distance: how management consulting firms use service marks to position competitively

Matthew Semadeni

Strategic Management Journal · 2005 · 70 citations · 73 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Positioning relative to rivals can confer competitive, legitimacy, uncertainty, and spillover benefits and costs, and firms aim to balance these forces. The study investigates how consulting firms position their services relative to rivals. The authors analyze service‑mark filings to assess how similarity, age, size, and prospective services influence positioning. The findings show that positioning is dyadic and multidimensional, with firms maximizing benefits of being near or far while mitigating drawbacks. © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract

Abstract This research examines the dyadic dynamics of positioning (i.e., determining where to locate relative to rivals) of services by consulting firms. Positioning near to or far from competitors offers both advantages and disadvantages in terms of competition, legitimacy, uncertainty, and spillovers, with recent research suggesting that firms seek balance between these various forces. Using a sample of service mark filings by consulting firms, I examine the effects of similarity, age, size, and prospective services on service positioning. Results indicate that positioning is both dyadic and multidimensional in nature, with firms maximizing the advantages of positioning either near or far, while minimizing the disadvantages. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

73