Panelist Judgments

Panelist Judgments is a methodological construct in the Nedelsky Method that refers to the collective cognitive decisions made by subject-matter experts when evaluating the probability that minimally competent examinees would eliminate incorrect multiple-choice options during standard-setting procedures.

39

Publications

1.9K

Citations

191

Authors

132

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

9

Authors

191

  1. BS
    Barbara S. Plake

    University of Nebraska–Lincoln, United States

    2 publications · 50 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. DL
    David Lundahl

    Oregon State University, United States

    2 publications · 85 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. SK
    Shigeyuki Kawa

    Shinshu University, Japan

    2 publications · 196 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. MM
    M.R. McDaniel

    Oregon State University, United States

    2 publications · 85 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. TK
    Terumi Kamisawa

    Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Japan

    2 publications · 196 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 191

Venues

  1. Journal of Sensory Studies

    6 publications · 290 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Journal of Food Science

    JFS · 3 publications · 428 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice

    EM · 2 publications · 32 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Social Policy and Society

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5