Content Validity Generalization
Content Validity Generalization is a methodological framework within measurement theory that extends the evidence of content validity from a specific assessment instrument or task to other contexts, populations, or domains by systematically evaluating the representativeness and relevance of content across generalized conditions.
65
Publications
4.2K
Citations
121
Authors
66
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
4
Parents
65
FORTY QUESTIONS ABOUT VALIDITY GENERALIZATION AND META‐ANALYSIS
Frank L. Schmidt, John E. Hunter, Kenneth Pearlman et al. · Personnel Psychology · 1985 · 222 citations
1–5 of 65
121
10
h-index
9
h-index
United States Office of Personnel Management, United States
5 publications · 630 citations
5
h-index
4
h-index
3
h-index
1–5 of 121
66
United States Office of Personnel Management
Washington D.C., United States
7 h-index
11 publications
1.2K citations
Michigan State University
East Lansing, United States
6 h-index
9 publications
757 citations
George Washington University
Washington, United States
6 h-index
6 publications
474 citations
State Farm (United States)
Bloomington, United States
3 h-index
5 publications
99 citations

Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
228 citations
University of Iowa
Iowa City, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
150 citations

Pennsylvania State University
State College, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
52 citations
University of Akron
Akron, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
84 citations
1–8 of 66
16 publications · 1K citations
15
h-index
14 publications · 975 citations
14
h-index
5 publications · 811 citations
5
h-index
1 publications · 12 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 24 citations
1
h-index
1–5