Publication | Open Access
Designing in Context: Reaching Beyond Usability in Learning Analytics Dashboard Design
106
Citations
37
References
2019
Year
Educational DashboardsEducationInstructional Design ModelsInstructional DesignTeacher EducationMathematics EducationGraphic DesignUbiquitous LearningLearning SciencesDesign NarrativeDesignUser ExperienceClassroom InstructionDesign MethodsLearning AnalyticsCurriculumEducational InnovationBeyond UsabilityMiddle School CurriculumDesign ThinkingEducational DesignComputer-based EducationSecondary Mathematics EducationImprovement ScienceLearning Design
Learning analytics systems are increasingly adopting human‑centred design, raising the need to understand how to apply design practice across diverse educational settings. The paper presents a design narrative of developing dashboards for middle school math teachers in a multi‑university, multi‑school district improvement science initiative, offering ways to adapt contextual design and design tensions methods for visual analytics. The authors document their design process, adapting contextual design and design tensions within an improvement science, research‑practice partnership to guide dashboard development for educators. The design process led to appropriation and repurposing of tools by district partners, directly informing improvement goals.
Researchers and developers of learning analytics (LA) systems are increasingly adopting human-centred design (HCD) approaches, with growing need to understand how to apply design practice in different educational settings. In this paper, we present a design narrative of our experience developing dashboards to support middle school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical practices, in a multi-university, multi-school district, improvement science initiative in the United States. Through documentation of our design experience, we offer ways to adapt common HCD methods — contextual design and design tensions — when developing visual analytics systems for educators. We also illuminate how adopting these design methods within the context of improvement science and research–practice partnerships fundamentally influences the design choices we make and the focal questions we undertake. The results of this design process flow naturally from the appropriation and repurposing of tools by district partners and directly inform improvement goals.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1