Publication | Open Access
The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics
349
Citations
118
References
2019
Year
Robotic SystemsEngineeringField RoboticsIntelligent RoboticsAutonomous SystemsUnmanned VehicleAbstract Robotic TechnologiesEmergency Response StakeholdersRescue RobotUnmanned SystemUnmanned Ground VehicleSystems EngineeringRobot LearningRoboticsAssistive TechnologyCurrent StateAerial RoboticsAerospace EngineeringAutomationSurface RoboticsDisaster Recovery EffortsUnmanned Aerial Systems
Robotic technologies, including remotely operated vehicles, autonomous agents, assistive devices, and novel control interfaces, hold promise for deployment in real‑world environments, especially in post‑disaster scenarios, yet current field‑deployable solutions often lack the robustness, speed, versatility, and ease of use required by rescue workers. The paper surveys the current state of ground, aerial, marine, amphibious robots and human‑robot control interfaces to evaluate their readiness for first‑responder and disaster‑recovery needs. The authors collected expert opinions from emergency‑response stakeholders and field‑deployment researchers to assess these technologies. The resulting assessment highlights gaps and guides future research toward impactful disaster‑response robotics.
Abstract Robotic technologies, whether they are remotely operated vehicles, autonomous agents, assistive devices, or novel control interfaces, offer many promising capabilities for deployment in real‐world environments. Postdisaster scenarios are a particularly relevant target for applying such technologies, due to the challenging conditions faced by rescue workers and the possibility to increase their efficacy while decreasing the risks they face. However, field‐deployable technologies for rescue work have requirements for robustness, speed, versatility, and ease of use that may not be matched by the state of the art in robotics research. This paper aims to survey the current state of the art in ground and aerial robots, marine and amphibious systems, and human–robot control interfaces and assess the readiness of these technologies with respect to the needs of first responders and disaster recovery efforts. We have gathered expert opinions from emergency response stakeholders and researchers who conduct field deployments with them to understand these needs, and we present this assessment as a way to guide future research toward technologies that will make an impact in real‐world disaster response and recovery.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1