2017 · 26 citations · 18 references
EducationEducational AssessmentEducational TechnologyAssessment For LearningComputer-assisted InstructionStudent EngagementBehavioral EngagementEngagement AnalysisEngagement MeasurementLearner Behavior AnalysisLearner Engagement ModelingMultimodal InteractionBehavioral Engagement DetectionDecision-level Sensor FusionEngagement Behavior AnalysisMultimodal Data AcquisitionMultimodal Data CollectionMultimodal Data FusionStudent Activity RecognitionStudent Engagement Analysis
The study investigates detecting students’ on‑task versus off‑task engagement states in authentic classroom settings. A multimodal approach uses unobtrusive appearance, context‑performance, and mouse data, training separate unimodal classifiers and fusing decisions, with distinct pipelines for instructional and assessment phases, evaluated on 17 students across 13 40‑minute math sessions. Separate pipelines improved performance: for instructional sessions, appearance alone achieved an F1 of 0.74 versus 0.70 for fused modalities, while for assessment sessions, fusing all three modalities reached an F1 of 0.89 compared to 0.81 for the best unimodal approach.
In this paper, we investigate detection of students' behavioral engagement states (On-Task vs. Off-Task) in authentic classroom settings. We propose a multimodal detection approach, based on three unobtrusive modalities readily available in a 1:1 learning scenario where learning technologies are incorporated. These modalities are: (1)Appearance: upper-body video captured using a camera; (2) Context-Performance: students' interaction and performance data related to learning content; and (3) Mouse: data related to mouse movements during learning process. For each modality, separate unimodal classifiers were trained, and decision-level fusion was applied to obtain final behavioral engagement states. We also analyzed each modality based on Instructional and Assessment sections separately (i.e., Instructional where a student is reading an article or watching an instructional video vs. Assessment where a student is solving exercises on the digital learning platform). We carried out various experiments on a dataset collected in an authentic classroom, where students used laptops equipped with cameras and they consumed learning content for Math on a digital learning platform. The dataset included multimodal data of 17 students who attended a Math course for 13 sessions (40 minutes each). The results indicate that it is beneficial to have separate classification pipelines for Instructional and Assessment sections: For Instructional, using only Appearance modality yields an F1-measure of 0.74, compared to fused performance of 0.70. For Assessment, fusing all three modalities (F1-measure of 0.89) provide a prominent improvement over the best performing unimodality (i.e., 0.81 for Appearance).
18
Gary Bradski · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2000 · 3.1K citations
Dlib-ml: A Machine Learning Toolkit
Davis E. King · 2009 · 2.9K citations
One millisecond face alignment with an ensemble of regression trees
Vahid Kazemi, Josephine Sullivan · 2014 · 2.8K citations · Full text