2008 · 477 citations · 15 references
ManagementInnovation ManagementOrganizational BehaviorInnovationKnowledge SharingRecruitmentCustomer ParticipationSocial InnovationCrowd-based InnovationCrowdsourced ParticipationCrowdsourcingProduction Process ChangeWeb 2.0
Web 2.0 innovations have enabled a shift from passive consumers to “working consumers” who collaborate on production tasks while firms retain control, marking a historically significant change in firm‑customer relations. The study aims to refine the definition of crowdsourcing, catalogue its forms, and distinguish it from related phenomena. The authors analyze crowdsourcing by defining it, cataloguing its forms, differentiating it from related concepts, and discussing its future organizational implications.
This paper investigates the phenomena of or the outsourcing of tasks to the general internet public. This phenomenon was made possible by technological innovations associated with Web 2.0 but is evidence of historically significant change in the relations between firms and their customers. We are witnessing the emergence of a new consumer type: the working consumer. In the conventional role, consumers were passive “kings” to be waited upon. Consumers now are becoming more like co-workers who take over specific parts of a production process, whereby this process ultimately remains under the control of a commercial enterprise. This article seeks a more precise definition of crowdsourcing, catalogues some of its forms, and differentiates them from peripherally related phenomena. It ends with a discussion regarding potential consequences (negative and positive) of crowdsourcing for the future organization of work.
15
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Kaspar D. Naegele, Erving Goffman · American Sociological Review · 1956 · 26.2K citations
Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition
Journal of Manufacturing Systems · 1999 · 2.3K citations