Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constucts.

878

Citations

78

References

2001

Year

TLDR

Brand personality dimensions are examined within cross‑cultural research on values, affect, globalization, and cultural frame shifting. The study argues that consumption symbols embed meanings that represent and institutionalize cultural values and beliefs. Using a combined emic‑etic approach, four studies examined how symbolic and expressive attributes of commercial brands are structured across three cultures. Studies 1–2 identified common brand personality dimensions (Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication) and culture‑specific dimensions (Peacefulness in Japan, Ruggedness in the U.S.), while studies 3–4 extended this to Spain, revealing common dimensions (Sincerity, Excitement, Sophistication) plus Spanish‑specific Passion and U.S.‑specific Competence and Ruggedness.

Abstract

This research argues that the meaning embedded in consumption symbols, such as commercial brands, can serve to represent and institutionalize the values and beliefs of a culture. Relying on a combined emic-etic approach, the authors conducted 4 studies to examine how symbolic and expressive attributes associated with commercial brands are structured and how this structure varies across 3 cultures. Studies 1 and 2 revealed a set of "brand personality" dimensions common to both Japan and the United States (Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, and Sophistication), as well as culture-specific Japanese (Peacefulness) and American (Ruggedness) dimensions. Studied 3 and 4, which extended this set of findings to Spain, yielded brand personality dimensions common to both Spain and the United States (Sincerity, Excitement, and Sophistication), plus nonshared Spanish (Passion) and American (Competence and Ruggedness) dimensions. The meaning of these brand personality dimensions is discussed in the context of cross-cultural research on values and affect, globalization issues, and cultural frame shifting.

References

YearCitations

Page 1