2008 · 530 citations · 15 references
EngineeringMechanical EngineeringRobotics EngineeringHuman-robot InteractionRobot DesignRoboticsActuator IntegrationJoint DesignJoint MechanicsMechanical Structure DesignRobot ManipulatorsVariable Stiffness MechanismsAnthropomorphic Robot DesignRobot Joint DesignSafety ConstraintsStiffness ControlVariable Stiffness ActuationVariable Stiffness DesignVariable Stiffness JointsVariable-stiffness Actuators
Conventional rigid robotic joints struggle with unknown environments, safety constraints, and performance, limiting their use in tasks requiring rapid, safe interaction. The authors propose a variable‑stiffness joint (VS‑Joint) to overcome these limitations. The VS‑Joint integrates compact, high‑performance actuation with dynamically adjustable stiffness and mechanically programmable behavior. It adapts easily to diverse tasks, resists impacts, enables faster trajectories, and is well suited for shoulder and elbow joints of anthropomorphic arms.
Facing new tasks, the conventional rigid design of robotic joints has come to its limits. Operating in unknown environments current robots are prone to failure when hitting unforeseen rigid obstacles. Moreover, safety constraints are a major aspect for robots interacting with humans. In order to operate safely, existing robotic systems in this field are slow and have a lack of performance. To circumvent these limitations, a new robot joint with a variable stiffness approach (VS-Joint) is presented. It combines a compact and highly integrated design with high performance actuation. The VS- Joint features a highly dynamic stiffness adjustment along with a mechanically programmable system behavior. This allows an easy adaption to a big variety of tasks. A benefit of the joint is its intrinsic robustness against impacts and hard contacts, which permits faster trajectories and handling. Thus, it provides excellent attributes for the use in shoulder and elbow joints of an anthropomorphic robot arm.
15
Gill A. Pratt, Matthew M. Williamson · 2002 · 2.2K citations
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Engineering +17
Michael Zinn, Oussama Khatib, Bernard Roth et al. · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · 2004 · 405 citations
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Engineering +17