Agriculture and Human Values · 2015 · 223 citations · 16 references
AgricultureAgricultural EconomicsGender StudiesAgricultural DevelopmentAgricultural PolicyLivestock ProductionAgricultural Household EconomicsLivestock DevelopmentFarm Household AssetsGender Roles In AgricultureIntra-household DynamicsLivelihood BenefitsMarket-oriented ProductionSmallholder FarmersSmallholder LivelihoodsWomen's Access To Resources
Smallholder farmers, especially women, face gendered asset ownership that limits their ability to invest in market‑oriented agriculture, yet the link between women’s assets and participation in interventions is understudied. The study examines how four high‑value agriculture interventions affect gender relations and women’s asset holdings, and argues that additional targeted support may be required to enhance women’s asset acquisition. The authors analyze four interventions that promoted high‑value agriculture with varying market orientation to assess changes in gender relations and women’s assets. The projects successfully involved women and raised production, income, and household assets, but men’s incomes rose more, and gender‑asset barriers and norms limited gains, highlighting the need for adaptive, gender‑equitable measures.
Abstract Strengthening the abilities of smallholder farmers in developing countries, particularly women farmers, to produce for both home and the market is currently a development priority. In many contexts, ownership of assets is strongly gendered, reflecting existing gender norms and limiting women’s ability to invest in more profitable livelihood strategies such as market-oriented agriculture. Yet the intersection between women’s asset endowments and their ability to participate in and benefit from agricultural interventions receives minimal attention. This paper explores changes in gender relations and women’s assets in four agricultural interventions that promoted high value agriculture with different degrees of market-orientation. Findings suggest that these dairy and horticulture projects can successfully involve women and increase production, income and the stock of household assets. In some cases, women were able to increase their control over production, income and assets; however in most cases men’s incomes increased more than women’s and the gender-asset gap did not decrease. Gender- and asset-based barriers to participation in projects as well as gender norms that limit women’s ability to accumulate and retain control over assets both contributed to the results. Comparing experiences across the four projects, especially where projects implemented adaptive measures to encourage gender-equitable outcomes, provides lessons for gender-responsive projects targeting existing and emerging value chains for high value products. Other targeted support to women farmers may also be needed to promote their acquisition of the physical assets required to expand production or enter other nodes of the value chain.
16
The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index
Sabina Alkire, Ruth Meinzen‐Dick, Amber Peterman et al. · World Development · 2013 · 902 citations
Agriculture, Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Development +12
Peter F. Orazem · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · 1999 · 378 citations · Full text
Christine Hotz, Cornelia Loechl, Abdelrahman Lubowa et al. · Journal of Nutrition · 2012 · 281 citations · Full text